Lecture slides on Moodle
Required reading:
- Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. (1995) Ethnography: Principles in practice, 2nd ed., London: Routledge.
- Read chapter 4, ‘Field relations’, pp.80-123.
- Access reading via Moodle
- Atkinson-Sheppard, S. (2022) Developing Authenticity, Building Connections: Exploring Research Methodologies in Asia. Asian Journal of Criminology, 17(2): 157-174.
Further reading:
- Wincup, E. (2017) ‘Ethnography’, in E.Wincup (ed) Criminological Research: Understanding Qualitative Methods, 2nd ed., London: SAGE Publications, pp. 113-128.
- Rowe, A. (2014) Situating the Self in Prison Research: Power, Identity, and Epistemology. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(4): 404-416.
- Bell, K. (2019) The ‘problem’ of undesigned relationality: Ethnographic fieldwork, dual roles and research ethics. Ethnography, 20(1): 8-26. Access ebook via iDiscover
- Travers, M., Putt, J. and Howard-Wagner, D. (eds) (2013) Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 25 (1): 463-469, DOI: 10.1080/10345329.2013.12035973
- Crewe, B. (2006) ‘Prison drug dealing and the ethnographic lens’, The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(4): 347-368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2006.00428.x
- Bandyopadhyay, M. (2015) ‘Deviation and Limitations of (Prison) Ethnography: Postscript to Fieldwork in an Indian Prison’, in Sloan J (ed.) The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Ethnography. Palgrave Macmillan: pp 442-462.
- Bengtsson (2019) ‘Informed consent as a situated research process in an ethnography of incarcerated youth in Denmark’, in Billett P, Hart M and Martin D (eds.) Complexities of Researching with Young People. Routledge: pp 130-142.
- Schneider, L (2020) Sexual violence during research: How the unpredictability of fieldwork and the right to risk collide with academic bureaucracy and expectations. Critique of Anthropology, 40(2): 173-193. (CONTENT WARNING)