But first, Spain!

Gun Violence

Homicide in the US

Spiked recently and increasingly involves guns

Homicide in Chicago

Exaggerated in cities like Chicago, Philadelphia, Dallas

The agenda

 

How have these trends in gun violence translated into personal exposure to gun violence?

 

What are the effects of these exposures on health and behavior?

 

What is driving these trends in the first place?

The

Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods

  • 6200 children from 7 age cohorts, born 1978 to 1996
  • 3 interviews from 1995–2003
  • Representative of Chicago and its neighborhoods

Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods

  • 6200 children from 7 age cohorts, born 1978 to 1996
  • 3 interviews from 1995–2003
  • Representative of Chicago and its neighborhoods

PHDCN+

  • 60% subsample of 4 cohorts
  • 1057 interviewed in 2012
  • 682 followed-up in 2021
  • Followed throughout the US

Funded by:

Timeline

Exposure to Gun Violence

  • To what extent were individuals growing up in Chicago in the 1990s and early 2000s exposed to gun violence?
  • And how did this exposure differ by race, sex and birth cohort?

Age at first getting shot


  • Concentrated at transition to adulthood
  • Also late 30s / post-2016 but only for Black / Hispanic

Age first seeing someone get shot


  • Occurs more often and at earlier age than being shot
  • Similar race/ethnicity but not sex disparities

  • Adolescent exposure high in early 1990s, low afterward
  • Adult exposure low until 2016-2021
  • Black and Hispanic males at highest risk

Question: What drove these large swings in violence and exposure?

  • One key proximal cause: gun carrying

Gun Carrying

How does macro-context impact carrying across the life course?

  • When does onset of concealed carry occur?
  • Is there continuity in carry over the life course?

    • Are adolescent carriers still carrying today?
    • Does it differ for legal and illegal carry?
  • Does exposure to gun violence predict later carrying?

    • Does it differ for adolescents and adults?

Onset of concealed carry by age

  • Rapidly rises in adolescence, then again in 30s
  • Differences sharpest in adolescence

Onset of concealed carry by year

  • Adult increases are period effects
  • Large increases in new carriers since 2016

Continuity: Who is still carrying in 2020?

  • 60% of young carriers not carrying today
  • Young carriers no more likely to carry without permits

Exposure to gun violence and carrying

  • Exposed adolescents twice as likely to carry
  • Adult carry similar between those exposed and not

Age of first gun use by carry onset

  • 42% of young carriers used gun by 21
    • Those who didn’t never used a gun later in life
  • Lifetime gun use nearly equal by age 40

Two pathways of gun carrying

 

Adolescent-onset

  • \(\frac{1}{3}\) of those ever carrying
  • Most age out
  • Associated with immediate dangerous contexts
    • High risk of use

Adult-onset

  • \(\frac{2}{3}\) of those ever carrying
  • Most still carrying today
  • Associated with insecurity and diffuse threats
    • Low but cumulative use risk

What drives each pathway?

Let’s focus one key factor

a cultural frame in which people perceive the law as illegitimate, unresponsive, and ill equipped to ensure public safety.

when calling the police is not a viable option to remedy one’s problems—individuals may instead resolve their grievances by their own means

The inclination to violence springs from the circumstances of life… The code of the street is actually a cultural adaptation to a profound lack of faith in the police and the judicial system

Guns also:

  • Confer status
  • Deter threats
  • Facilitate dominance

Concentrated disadvantage → alienation from institutions

… two racially differentiated beliefs promote legal gun carrying: The belief common among most carriers that police are inadequate protectors—and thus one may carry a gun as protection from crime—and the belief more common among non-white carriers that police are coercive violators of rights—and thus one may carry a gun as protection from and resistance to the oppressive state (Lanfear et al. 2024)

Linked to diffuse social and economic insecurities

How does life-course variation in carrying impact rates of violence?

Changing age distribution of homicide

Gun homicide is increasingly committed by adults

Not attributable to age composition

Also: Homicide nadir in 2000 but age-shift occurred in 2010

Two similar periods of high gun violence, except…

Early 1990s

  • Concentrated in adolescence
  • Slow accumulation:
    • Deindustrialization, segregation, lead, etc.
  • Context: Concentrated disadvantage, gangs, and illicit markets

 

2016-2021

  • Concentrated in adulthood
  • Rapid destabilization:
    • Trump, Ferguson, COVID-19, Floyd, etc.
  • Context: Widespread insecurity, loss of faith in institutions

Both: Stark sex and race heterogeneity

Social change and the life course

 

G bsc1 Social Change bsi Age-graded contexts bsc1->bsi bsc2 Future social change / contexts bsc1->bsc2 bsa Crime and punishment bsi->bsa bsa->bsc2 bsc1bsc2 Macro-historical bsabsc2 Cohort differentiation bsibsa Life course bsc1bsi Cohort dynamics

Classic concerns of demography and life course research… mostly

Age-graded model of gun carrying and gun violence

G btitle Adolescent Process bsc1 Local instability bsi Specific fear & cynicism (Risky situations) bsc1->bsi bsc2 Increased youth violence bsc1->bsc2 bsa Youth gun carrying (Illegal) bsi->bsa bsa->bsc2
G title Adult Process sc1 Societal instability si General fear & cynicism (Risky world) sc1->si sc2 Increased adult violence sc1->sc2 sa Adult gun carrying (Mostly legal) si->sa sa->sc2

Argument: 2021 was not a reprise of 1999, rather both were the result of differential activation of processes responding to macrosocial context

Some expectations

1995

  • Spatially concentrated
    • Strong disadvantage link
    • Local cynicism
  • Similar offender/victim
    • Acquaintances
  • Group-oriented
  • Criminal contexts
    • Fewer legal guns
    • Gun policy less relevant

2021

  • More dispersed
    • Weaker disadvantage link
    • General cynicism
  • Less similar offender/victim
    • Strangers
  • Individual-oriented
  • Non-criminal contexts
    • More legal guns
    • Gun policy more relevant

Early evidence

The future

Expanding cynicism

  • From local to national focus
  • Alienation without concentrated disadvantage

National politics

  • Violation of letter and spirit of law
  • Declining legitimacy of institutions

The life course

  • When are formative years for legal cynicism?
  • What are the long-term macrosocial consequences?

New questions

  • How do we test empirically?

    • Alternate explanations?
    • Integrating life course with changing neighborhood effects
  • Is it changes in context or changes in meaning of contexts?

    • Gendered and racialized impacts and reactions
  • How does this relate to broader macrosocial change?

    • Gun culture
    • Social media
    • Polarization
    • Unstructured socialization

Feedback and questions

Contact:

Charles C. Lanfear
Institute of Criminology
University of Cambridge
cl948@cam.ac.uk

For more about the PHDCN+:

PHDCN@fas.harvard.edu
https://sites.harvard.edu/phdcn/
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-022-00203-0